STL /// COL

SENDS:

David Backes RW 31 4500000 1 56 79 77 76 83 75 95 73 86 56 78 72 74 77 84 77
Kevin Shattenkirk D 26 4250000 2 65 76 76 78 73 73 68 77 78 82 58 55 68 76 71 73

SENDS:

Phil Kessel RW 28 8000000 7 53 94 83 88 70 80 77 99 99 82 74 67 66 88 75 82

I don't know

SURE

gonna have to decline

i think ok

2 declines 2 accepts.

decline ,soory

just like the know a reason for the decline so we know what to work on if it doesnt go through ?

and waiting on i think ?


2 accept 2 declines

Such mixed opinions lol what is wrong with the trade

Backes is like not so far off from kessel just more defensive and shattenkirk is enough to cover for the differnce

It's a decline from me

k cool, just want to know why and what we can work on ?

i think its fine

i decline because need add ,kessel is worth quite a bit more than backes and shatts doesnt cover difference imo.

Lohs Angeles wrote:

i decline because need add ,kessel is worth quite a bit more than backes and shatts doesnt cover difference imo.

thanks for clearing up

now its tied 3-3 lol

fact is i said good cus kessel doesnt get a pile more points than backes, defenitely doesnt cover shatts 40+ points and backes 70 anyway. backes is not that far off of kessel like kman says and knowing how players perform in actual sims has helped make my decision

omgggggggg its my turn to vote

seems fair , offensive forwards have more value than defensive forwards and thats a 2nd liner defensemen at best and has plenty of DEF to cover and gets depth